On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:35, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> ... and if so, isn't postmaster.c's code to transfer a HANDLE value to a >> child process all wet? > > It is definitely 64-bit. sizeof(HANDLE)==8. > > So yes, it looks completely broken. I guess Windows doesn't actually > *assign* you a handle larger than 2^32 until you actually ahve that > many open handles. Typical values on my test system (win64) comes out > at around 4000 in all tests. > > >> BTW, it seems like it'd be a good thing if we had a Win64 machine in the >> buildfarm. > > Yes. I actually thought we had one. Dave, weren't you going to set one up?
I was, but I saw one there so didn't bother (hamerkop). Windows buildfarm critters can take a surprising amount of herding... -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
