On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:01, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:35, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> ... and if so, isn't postmaster.c's code to transfer a HANDLE value to a >> child process all wet? > > It is definitely 64-bit. sizeof(HANDLE)==8. > > So yes, it looks completely broken. I guess Windows doesn't actually > *assign* you a handle larger than 2^32 until you actually ahve that > many open handles. Typical values on my test system (win64) comes out > at around 4000 in all tests.
Patch applied for this and backpatched to 9.0. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
