On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:17 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 07:09:08PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:05 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: >> >> > Could someone please commit this? :) >> >> >> >> Eh... was there some reason you didn't add it to the CommitFest app? >> > >> > I forgot. >> >> A fair excuse. :-) >> >> >> Because that's what I work from. >> > >> > It's pretty trivial, but I don't feel comfortable adding it >> > after the close. :/ >> >> So add it to the next one, and we'll get it then if nobody picks it up >> sooner... > > Given its small and isolated nature, I was hoping we could get this in > sooner rather than later. As I understand it, CFs are there to review > patches that take significant effort for even a committer to > understand, so this doesn't really fit that model.
Well, then add it to this one if you think that's more appropriate. My point is simple: I review patches because they are in the CF queue. Your point seems to be: put mine ahead of the others, and review it immediately. Someone else may very well be willing to do that; I'm not. > David (refraining from mentioning anything about the time taken today > to discuss this vs. the time it would have taken to push the thing) Mention anything you want. My guess is it would take me an hour. You're certainly right that this discussion is a waste of time, but possibly not for the reasons you are supposing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
