Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On tis, 2010-11-30 at 14:20 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > I agree, that argument is completely misconceived. If the DBA is > > paying enough attention to use LIMIT, s/he should be paying enough > > attention not to do damage in the first place. If that were the only > > argument in its favor I'd be completely against the feature. > > I don't have any use for DELETE with LIMIT, but UPDATE with LIMIT could > be very useful if you are doing full-table updates and you don't have > enough space so you do it in chunks.
So should this now be a TODO item? Text? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
