On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 06.12.2010 15:53, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> I guess. It still seems far too much like exposing the server's guts >> for my taste. It might not be as bad as the expression tree stuff, >> but there's nothing particularly good about it either. > > Note that we already have txid_current_snapshot() function, which exposes > all that.
Fair enough, and I think that's actually useful for Slony &c. But I don't think we should shy away of providing a cleaner API here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
