Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > Yeah. I'm still not convinced that using shared memory is a bad way to > pass these around. Surely we're not talking about large numbers of them. > What am I missing here?
They're not of a very predictable size. Robert's idea of publish() returning a temp file identifier, which then gets removed at transaction end, might work all right. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers