2010/12/13 Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de>: > On Monday 13 December 2010 15:27:48 Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin <dmit...@gmail.com>: >> > Hey Pavel, >> > >> > 2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> Hello >> >> >> >> this is little bit offtopic, sorry. >> >> >> >> I am thinking, so we need a standard associative array support in core >> >> - like Perl, Python or Javascript. So, I don't think, so migration of >> >> hstore to core is good idea. >> > >> > Could you tell why in-core associative array support would be better >> > than in-core hstore support ? >> > We enjoying to use hstore and thinking that it is implemented great. >> >> Because hstore is PostgreSQL specific type. More well known syntax is >> better. More - who know, what is hstore? But everybody know, what is >> associative array or hash. > So youre disturbed by the name? >
name and interface - hstore is designed as external module - a internal class can be designed different. Pavel > Andres > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
