On Monday 13 December 2010 16:01:35 Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2010/12/13 Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de>: > > On Monday 13 December 2010 15:27:48 Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> 2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin <dmit...@gmail.com>: > >> > Hey Pavel, > >> > > >> > 2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> Hello > >> >> > >> >> this is little bit offtopic, sorry. > >> >> > >> >> I am thinking, so we need a standard associative array support in > >> >> core - like Perl, Python or Javascript. So, I don't think, so > >> >> migration of hstore to core is good idea. > >> > > >> > Could you tell why in-core associative array support would be better > >> > than in-core hstore support ? > >> > We enjoying to use hstore and thinking that it is implemented great. > >> > >> Because hstore is PostgreSQL specific type. More well known syntax is > >> better. More - who know, what is hstore? But everybody know, what is > >> associative array or hash. > > > > So youre disturbed by the name? > > name and interface - hstore is designed as external module - a > internal class can be designed different. Could you actually name such a difference rather than pointing to some airily hint of one? That would make it way much easier to see where you want to go.
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers