Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> writes: > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> However, the only way I can see to fix this "automatically" is to have >> the makefiles propagate PG_VERSION_NUM (or one of the other values set >> by configure) into generated control files. > > Ah, somewhat like what I was asked to remove from the patch, right?
I've been pointed off-list that this message ain't conveying the meaning I'm attaching it, sorry about that. What I mean is that should we change our opinion again the code to do that has already been written. Allow me to insist on "we": it's not like I feel forced into changing the design again and again, I realise I'm acting eagerly upon group decision making steps before to ensure it's the final step. Well, we all have been reading over-stressed exchanges on this list before, right? :) Will now step back on the topic, or try to... Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
