Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> plpgsql's parser is rickety enough that I don't have a lot of confidence
>> in its ability to do things that way.

> Bummer.  Rickety is not good.

Agreed, but it's not entirely the parser's fault: the language
definition is pretty d*mn bogus to start with.  Read the comments for
the for_variable production, and ask yourself whether you really want
to inject even more difficult-to-disambiguate cases right there.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to