Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes:
> How about doing target != ALL test at the head for the most common case
> (target == ALL)?

That's an idea, but the test you propose implements it incorrectly.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to