On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Fujii Masao <[email protected]> writes: >> How about doing target != ALL test at the head for the most common case >> (target == ALL)? > > That's an idea, but the test you propose implements it incorrectly.
Thanks! I revised the patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
signal-some-children-v3.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
