Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Quan Zongliang's message of mar dic 21 18:36:11 -0300 2010: > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:29:17 -0300 > > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > > > > I think the way this should work is that you call postmaster with a new > > > switch and it prints out its configuration, after reading the > > > appropriate config file(s). That way it handles all the little details > > > such as figuring out the correct config file, hadle include files, etc. > > > This output would be presumably easier to parse and more trustworthy. > > > > Sorry for my late reply. > > > > I will check the source of postmaster. > > Actually Bruce Momjian is now working on a different fix: > unix_socket_directory would be added to postmaster.pid, allowing pg_ctl > to find it.
Yes, I will apply this patch tomorrow and it will be in 9.1. Thanks for the report. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers