On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:02:35 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Excerpts from Quan Zongliang's message of mar dic 21 18:36:11 -0300 2010:
> > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:29:17 -0300
> > > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > 
> > > > I think the way this should work is that you call postmaster with a new
> > > > switch and it prints out its configuration, after reading the
> > > > appropriate config file(s).  That way it handles all the little details
> > > > such as figuring out the correct config file, hadle include files, etc.
> > > > This output would be presumably easier to parse and more trustworthy.
> > > 
> > > Sorry for my late reply.
> > > 
> > > I will check the source of postmaster.
> > 
> > Actually Bruce Momjian is now working on a different fix:
> > unix_socket_directory would be added to postmaster.pid, allowing pg_ctl
> > to find it.
> 
> Yes, I will apply this patch tomorrow and it will be in 9.1.  Thanks for
> the report.
> 
Nice work.


-- 
Quan Zongliang <quanzongli...@gmail.com>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to