On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 06:37:26PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 12/24/2010 06:26 PM, Aidan Van Dyk wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake<j...@commandprompt.com> > >wrote: > > > >>I would have to agree here. The idea that we have to search email > >>is bad enough (issue/bug/feature tracker anyone?) but to have > >>someone say, search the archives? That is just plain rude and > >>anti-community. > >Saying "search the bugtracker" is no less rude than "search the > >archives"... > > > >And most of the bugtrackers I've had to search have way *less* > >ease-of-use for searching than a good mailing list archive (I tend > >to keep going back to gmane's search) > > It's deja vu all over again. See mailing list archives for details.
LOL! Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
