On 29.12.2010 10:36, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 18:12, Robert Haas<robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Although maybe now that we've made recovery.conf use the GUC lexer we oughta
continue in that vein and expose those parameters as PGC_INTERNAL GUCs rather
than inventing a new function for it...
That's definitely another option that I wouldn't object to if people
prefer that way.
I recall from previous discussions that we have a consensus that we
should unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf, so that they're all GUCs
and you can put all the settings in postgresql.conf. Let's do that.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-10/msg00033.php
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
