Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 18:12, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> Although maybe now that we've made recovery.conf use the GUC lexer we >>oughta continue in that vein and expose those parameters as >>PGC_INTERNAL GUCs rather than inventing a new function for it... > > That's definitely another option that I wouldn't object to if people > prefer that way.
+1. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
