On Sat, 4 May 2002, Joel Burton wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Lane > > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:07 PM > > To: mlw > > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports > > > > > > Rather than propagating the SysV semaphore API still further, why don't > > we kill it now? (I'm willing to keep the shmem API, however.) > > Would this have the benefit of allow PostgreSQL to work properly in BSD > jails, since lack of really working SysV IPC was the problem there?
There is no problem with SysV IPC in the jail, per se ... jail's were just not coded to delimite/segregate such IPC from other jails ... its one of those "caveat empor"(sp?) situations ... you can do it, but at your own risk, as somoene in another jail has the ability to 'attach' to your segments ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
