On 1/10/11 10:28 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> The techniques we use in our shop wouldn't interact badly with SSI,
> and I'm having trouble picturing what would. Sure, some of these
> techniques would no longer be needed, and would only add overhead if
> SSI was there.
Yeah? Well, you have more experience than I do in this; my clients have
tended to use SELECT FOR UPDATE instead of SERIALIZABLE. I'll defer to
you if you feel reasonably confident that breakage won't result.
And as I said, I'm unsure of how many people are using SERIALIZABLE in
any mission-critical context right now.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
