On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 11:29 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 1/10/11 10:47 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > > If they're not using SERIALIZABLE, this patch will have no impact on > > them at all. If they are using SELECT FOR UPDATE *with* > > SERIALIZABLE, everything will function exactly as it is except that > > there may be some serialization failures which they weren't getting > > before, either from the inevitable (but hopefully minimal) false > > positives inherent in the technique or because they missed covering > > something. > > Right, that's what I'm worried about.
If we must have a GUC, perhaps we could publish a sunset one release in the future. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers