* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > Minor enhancement, but a valuable one imv. Hopefully there aren't any > > issues with it. :) > > 1. Why %o? That's not obviously mnemonic. Perhaps %U?
r was taken? :) I'm not sure I like %U, but in the end I don't *really*
care. I'll update it to %U and wait for someone else to complain.
> 2. It won't be clear to people reading this what the difference is
> between %u and this. You probably need to reword the documentation
> for the existing option as well as documenting the new one.
Fair enough.
> 3. Please attach the patch rather than including it inline, if possible.
Hrm, I could have sworn that Tom had asked for the exact opposite in the
past, but either way is fine by me.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
