On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
>>> +1 for whatever the committer wants to commit. ;)
>
>> OK, done.  :-)
>
> Uh, did you actually stop to *think* about this patch?

You have a valid point here, but this isn't the most tactful way of putting it.

> What you have just committed puts a syscache lookup into the elog output
> path.  Quite aside from the likely performance hit, this will
> malfunction badly in any case where we're trying to log from an aborted
> transaction.
>
> Please revert and rethink.

I think it's going to take more than a rethink - I don't see any way
to salvage it.  :-(

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to