Tom,
On Jan 8, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes:
>> On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Well, actually, I just committed it. If you want to test, feel free.
>>> Note that right now only the anyarray && <@ @> operators are genuinely
>>> fixed ... I plan to hack on tsearch and contrib pretty soon though.
>
>> Hrm, the queries I wrote for this sort of thing use intarray:
>> WHERE blah @@ '(12|14)'::query_int
>> That's not done yet though, right?
>
> intarray is done now, feel free to test ...
Thanks, working on it now. I'm restoring a dump from 8.4, but got these erors:
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 3227; 2616 46485 OPERATOR
CLASS gin__int_ops postgres
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: function
ginarrayextract(anyarray, internal) does not exist
Command was: CREATE OPERATOR CLASS gin__int_ops
FOR TYPE integer[] USING gin AS
STORAGE integer ,
OPERATOR 3 &&(integer[],int...
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: operator class
"contrib.gin__int_ops" does not exist for access method "gin"
Command was: ALTER OPERATOR CLASS contrib.gin__int_ops USING gin OWNER TO
postgres;
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 3254; 3600 16245434 TEXT
SEARCH DICTIONARY en_mls_20101103 postgres
Did a signature change or something? Is there something that needs a
compatibility interface of some kind?
Thanks,
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
