> I think, and I know people are probably sick of me spouting opinions, > that if you want a Windows presence for PostgreSQL, then we should > write a real Win32 version.
The crucial wrong word is the word "we." If _you_ want a Windows presence, then _you_ should write a real Win32 version. That clearly attaches responsibility to someone who is interested. -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.mca@" "enworbbc")) http://www.cbbrowne.com/info/unix.html "I'm not switching from slrn. I'm quite confident that anything that *needs* to be posted in HTML is fatuous garbage not worth my time." -- David M. Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc@" "enworbbc")) http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/spreadsheets.html Rules of the Evil Overlord #166. "If the rebels manage to trick me, I will make a note of what they did so that I do not keep falling for the same trick over and over again." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
msg16822/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
