> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> I think, and I know people are probably sick of me spouting >>> opinions, that if you want a Windows presence for PostgreSQL, then >>> we should write a real Win32 version. >> >> The crucial wrong word is the word "we."
>> If _you_ want a Windows presence, then _you_ should write a real >> Win32 version. That clearly attaches responsibility to someone who >> is interested. > I have already said that I am willing to write the pieces for a > Windows port. The issue is changes in PostgreSQL required to do it. No, I don't think you understand. If you're planning to do a port, then _all_ changes are your responsibility. Nobody ought to need to change PostgreSQL in order for you to write a Windows port; that, in fact, would be a waste of time, having several people working on something that should probably be done by one person. -- (concatenate 'string "aa454" "@freenet.carleton.ca") http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/x.html Why are they called apartments, when they're all stuck together? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
