Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 18:59, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Just stick with the OID. There's no reason that I can see to have >> "friendly" names for these tarfiles --- in most cases, the DBA will >> never even deal with them, no?
> No, this is the output mode where the DBA chooses to get the output in > the form of tarfiles. So if chosen, he will definitely deal with it. Mph. How big a use-case has that got? Offhand I can't see a reason to use it at all, ever. If you're trying to set up a clone you want the files unpacked. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers