Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> Is there value in moving test_fsync to /contrib? > > > Why would we want to do that? > > So it would be built by default, installed under reasonable conditions, > and there would be a place to document it. Where it is, it's not a > user-facing thing at all.
I have cleaned up the code so it is reasonable to ship and use by end-users. It is documented already where we mention setting wal_sync_method, but having it in src/tools really is a hinderance. It seems like /contrib would be more natural, no? /bin seems like overkill because most people will not want to run it. Most of /contrib is installed already by installers, I think. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
