On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >>> It seems like /contrib would be more natural, no? /bin seems like >>> overkill because most people will not want to run it. Most of /contrib >>> is installed already by installers, I think. > >> At least on Red Hat, it is packaged separately. > > On Red Hat, it is not packaged at all (at least not by me), and won't > be unless it goes into contrib. I don't believe it belongs in the > base package.
I confess to some confusion about what things "belong" where. Is contrib the right place for this because we think it's half-baked, or because we think most people won't use it, or just because we're violently allergic to adding stuff to src/bin, or what? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
