Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > OK. I was thinking that instead moving this into > eval_const_expressions(), we just make the logic in > find_coercion_pathway() call the "exemptor" function (or whatever we > call it) right around here:
No, no, no, no. Didn't you read yesterday's discussion? parse_coerce is entirely the wrong place for this. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers