On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> OK. I was thinking that instead moving this into >> eval_const_expressions(), we just make the logic in >> find_coercion_pathway() call the "exemptor" function (or whatever we >> call it) right around here: > > No, no, no, no. Didn't you read yesterday's discussion? parse_coerce > is entirely the wrong place for this.
I not only read it, I participated in it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
