2011/1/28 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> variant a) my first patch - detoast on first usage with avoiding to >> useless detoast checking >> variant b) my first patch - detoast on first usage without avoiding to >> useless detoast checking >> >> time for 1 - about 300 ms, a is bout 1.5% faster than b >> time for 2 - about 30000 ms, a is about 3% faster than b > > This makes your approach sound pretty good, but it sounds like we > might need to find a better way to structure the code. >
do you have a any idea? Pavel > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
