On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> variant a) my first patch - detoast on first usage with avoiding to
> useless detoast checking
> variant b) my first patch - detoast on first usage without avoiding to
> useless detoast checking
>
> time for 1 - about 300 ms, a is bout 1.5% faster than b
> time for 2 - about 30000 ms, a is about 3% faster than b

This makes your approach sound pretty good, but it sounds like we
might need to find a better way to structure the code.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to