Greg Smith wrote: > Greg Smith wrote: > > I think the right way to compute "relations to sync" is to finish the > > sorted writes patch I sent over a not quite right yet update to already > > Attached update now makes much more sense than the misguided patch I > submitted two weesk ago. This takes the original sorted write code, > first adjusting it so it only allocates the memory its tag structure is > stored in once (in a kind of lazy way I can improve on right now). It > then computes a bunch of derived statistics from a single walk of the > sorted data on each pass through. Here's an example of what comes out:
In that patch, I would like to see a meta-comment explaining why the sorting is happening and what we hope to gain. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
