On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:48 AM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> wrote: > Robert, I think that the core extension if pretty uncontroversial, modulo > some minor issues. It's the upgrade process that's more controversial. I > think the case can be made to accept even that part as Dim has written it, > because it is pretty much the bare minimum that other solutions could be > built on top of and improve upon. But if not, I think that's the only part > the one might really look at as something to omit for 9.1.
Yeah, I understand. I believe Tom said he was going to look at the basic functionality with an eye toward commit, and I hope to look at it as well, either before or after it gets committed. Time permitting, I'd then like to look at this, but I'm not sure I'm going to be able to squeeze that into the time available, nor am I sure that I'd get sufficient consensus to commit something even if I did. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
