Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Err... wait.  Actually, I think the right thing to do might be to
> remove OCLASS_FOREIGN_TABLE altogether.  I don't think it's actually
> used for anything.  For a foreign table, we use OCLASS_CLASS, just as
> we do for indexes and sequences.  I think that's just leftover crap
> that I failed to rip out.

OK.  I'll fix it as part of the extensions patch, since it's touching
all those same places anyway.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to