Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Err... wait. Actually, I think the right thing to do might be to > remove OCLASS_FOREIGN_TABLE altogether. I don't think it's actually > used for anything. For a foreign table, we use OCLASS_CLASS, just as > we do for indexes and sequences. I think that's just leftover crap > that I failed to rip out.
OK. I'll fix it as part of the extensions patch, since it's touching all those same places anyway. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers