On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Err... wait. Actually, I think the right thing to do might be to >> remove OCLASS_FOREIGN_TABLE altogether. I don't think it's actually >> used for anything. For a foreign table, we use OCLASS_CLASS, just as >> we do for indexes and sequences. I think that's just leftover crap >> that I failed to rip out. > > OK. I'll fix it as part of the extensions patch, since it's touching > all those same places anyway.
Excellent, thanks! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
