Robert Haas wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:37 AM, C?dric Villemain > <cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Please update the commitfest with the accurate patch, there is only > > the old immature v1 of the patch in it. > > I was about reviewing it... > > > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=500 > > Woops, sorry about that. Here's an updated version, which I will also > add to the CommitFest application. > > The need for this patch has been somewhat ameliorated by the fsync > queue compaction patch. I tested with:
Uh, in this C comment: + * or not we want to take the time to write it. We allow up to 5% of + * otherwise-not-dirty pages to be written due to hint bit changes, 5% of what? 5% of all buffers? 5% of all hint-bit-dirty ones? Can you clarify this in the patch? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
