On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Uh, in this C comment: > > + * or not we want to take the time to write it. We allow up to 5% of > + * otherwise-not-dirty pages to be written due to hint bit changes, > > 5% of what? 5% of all buffers? 5% of all hint-bit-dirty ones? Can you > clarify this in the patch?
5% of buffers that are hint-bit-dirty but not otherwise dirty. ISTM that's exactly what the comment you just quoted says on its face, but I'm open to some other wording you want to propose. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
