On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's not quite so good for translators, I think. > > Another option is that we could just say "relation" (table, foreign > table, etc...) or "type". We use the word relation as a more generic > version of table in a few other places.
Or how about passing an ObjectType? Then we could specify OBJECT_TABLE, OBJECT_FOREIGN_TABLE, or OBJECT_TYPE. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
