On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:04:02AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > >> Or how about passing an ObjectType? ?Then we could specify > >> OBJECT_TABLE, OBJECT_FOREIGN_TABLE, or OBJECT_TYPE. > > > > Could this be done without a several-line blob of code at each call site to > > determine the answer? ?If and only if so, this sounds better. > > Yeah, that's a problem. New thought: how about we go back more or > less to the original coding, except replacing the second argument > (only) with a Relation? In other words, callers will pass either a > Relation (which might be a table or foreign table) or a type name. > Not particularly elegant, but no worse than what we had before.
Sounds good. Thanks. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
