On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:09:48PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > If we don't allocate all the memory up front, does that allow memory > to be dynamically shared between different hash tables in shared > memory? I'm thinking not, but... > > Frankly, I think this is an example of how our current shared memory > model is a piece of garbage.
What other model(s) might work better? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
