Thanks for the review! On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > I see that the docs part of the patch removes the mentioning of > reporting servers - is that intentional, or a mistake? Seems that > usecase still remains, no?
It was intentional, but I agree with you. I re-added the mention to the reporting servers. On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > Also, the patch no longer applies, since it conflicts with > faa0550572583f51dba25611ab0f1d1c31de559b. > > Since you (Fujii-san) wrote both of them, feel like rebasing it > properly for current master? Yeah, I rebased the patch to the current git master and attached it. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
pg_ctl_promote_v4.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
