On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the review! > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> I see that the docs part of the patch removes the mentioning of >> reporting servers - is that intentional, or a mistake? Seems that >> usecase still remains, no? > > It was intentional, but I agree with you. I re-added the mention to > the reporting servers. > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> Also, the patch no longer applies, since it conflicts with >> faa0550572583f51dba25611ab0f1d1c31de559b. >> >> Since you (Fujii-san) wrote both of them, feel like rebasing it >> properly for current master? > > Yeah, I rebased the patch to the current git master and attached it.
Committed with minor tweaks to comments and documentation. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
