2011/2/14 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> "David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes:
>> On Feb 14, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> I'm not convinced. There was nothing in that discussion why any
>>>> particular character would have to be allowed in a version number.
>
>>> Well, there's already a counterexample in the current contrib stuff:
>>> uuid-ossp. We could rename that to uuid_ossp of course, but it's
>>> not clear to me that there's consensus for forbidding dashes here.
why do we care if there is a dash in the middle of a text where there
are no numbers ?
>
>> I'd be fine if commas were used instead.
>
> Commas do not seem like an improvement to me at all --- they are widely
> used as list separators.
>
> I guess the real question is what's Peter's concrete objection to the
> double-dash method?
I have to admit that I am a bit surprised by this -- stuff too.
An objection might be completely non-technical, but advocacy :
"what this funny new name convention those PostgreSQL folks did invent ?!"
--
Cédric Villemain 2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
