On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:26 PM, marcin mank <marcin.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> On mån, 2011-02-14 at 12:14 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I guess the real question is what's Peter's concrete objection to the >>> double-dash method? >> >> It just looks a bit silly and error prone. And other packaging systems >> have been doing without it for decades. > > how about : we use a single dash as the separator, and if the > extension author insists on having a dash in the name, as a punishment > he must duplicate the dash, i.e.: > uuid--ossp-1.0--5.5.sql
That has a certain poetic justice to it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
