Excerpts from Joachim Wieland's message of vie feb 18 21:41:51 -0300 2011: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > 1. why are you using the expansible char array stuff instead of using > > the StringInfo facility? > > > > 2. is md5 the most appropriate digest for this? If you need a > > cryptographically secure hash, do we need something stronger? If not, > > why not just use hash_any? > > We don't need a cryptographically secure hash.
Ok. > Should I send an updated patch? Anything else? No need, I'm halfway through already. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
