On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 18:24, Lamar Owen wrote: > In any case, this isn't just a Red Hat problem, as it's going to cause > problems with the use of timestamps on ANY glibc 2.2.5 dist. That's more > than Red Hat, by a large margin.
I'm running glibc 2.2.5 on Debian and all regression tests pass OK (with make check). I don't see any note in the glibc Debian changelog about reversing an upstream change to mktime(). I missed the first messages in this thread and I can't find them in the archive. What should I be looking for to see if I have the problem you have encountered or to see why I don't have it if I ought to have? -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C "O come, let us worship and bow down; let us kneel before the LORD our maker." Psalms 95:6
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
