Trond Eivind Glomsrød <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Relying on nonstandardized/nondocumented behaviour is a program bug,
> not a glibc bug.

The question is: how this thing didn't show up before? ISTM that
someone is not doing his work correctly.

> PostgreSQL needs fixing.

Arguably, however, right now is *a lot easier* to fix glibc, and it's
really needed for production systems using postgreSQL and working on
RedHat. But redhat users doesn't matter, the most important thing is
*strict* conformace to standars, right?

> Since we ship both, we're looking at it, but glibc is not the
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The sad true is: you only answered when the 'Complain to Red Hat'
statement appeared, not a single word before and not a single word
when the bug report were closed. I'm really disappointed.

The nice thing is: glibc is free software and we don't have to wait or
relay on some of the redhat staff members (thanks god) for this to get
fixed or say: for the standard to get extended again. The patch to
glibc is pretty straightforward and attached.

Regards,
Manuel.

--- glibc-2.2.5/time/mktime.c.org	Tue May 21 11:37:06 2002
+++ glibc-2.2.5/time/mktime.c	Tue May 21 11:39:28 2002
@@ -259,11 +259,13 @@
 
   int sec_requested = sec;
 
+#if 0
   /* Only years after 1970 are defined.
      If year is 69, it might still be representable due to
      timezone differnces.  */
   if (year < 69)
     return -1;
+#endif
 
 #if LEAP_SECONDS_POSSIBLE
   /* Handle out-of-range seconds specially,

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to