On 03/02/2011 03:39 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
Truly "synchronous" requires two-phase commit, which this never was. So the absence or presence of the poorly specified parameter called allow_standalone_primary should have no bearing on what we call this feature.
I haven't been following this very closely, but to me this screams out that we simply must not call it "synchronous".
Just my $0.02 worth. cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
