On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 15:50 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > I assumed that when Simon was talking about removing > allow_standalone_primary, he meant making the code always behave as if > it were turned OFF.
That is the part that is currently not fully specified, so no that is not currently included in the patch. That isn't double-talk for "and I will not include it". What I mean is I'd rather have something than nothing, whatever we decide to call it. But the people that want it had better come up with a clear definition of how it will actually work, covering all cases, not just "splish splash, it kinda works and we'll let Simon will work out the rest". -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
